What is considered good art and by whose standards?
Page 1 of 1
What is considered good art and by whose standards?
I am doing a study of "Faith and Reason" written by Pope John Paul II.
Tonight we were talking about objectivity and subjectivity. Art was the
example used to discuss one's own perception of good art and bad art and
the universal perception of it. I am confused by the subject of art. I
personally think good and bad art is subject to one's own personal
opinion.
Can anyone explain to me what is 'good art'? Like Michelango, Picaso
& Van Gogh versus modern art? And by whose standards is 'good art'
classified as such?
I've never taken an art class, I only draw privately once in a while but
I don't consider myself an artist. What books or websites can I go to
to learn about art?
short sale orlando
plumber sydney
Tonight we were talking about objectivity and subjectivity. Art was the
example used to discuss one's own perception of good art and bad art and
the universal perception of it. I am confused by the subject of art. I
personally think good and bad art is subject to one's own personal
opinion.
Can anyone explain to me what is 'good art'? Like Michelango, Picaso
& Van Gogh versus modern art? And by whose standards is 'good art'
classified as such?
I've never taken an art class, I only draw privately once in a while but
I don't consider myself an artist. What books or websites can I go to
to learn about art?
short sale orlando
plumber sydney
Guest- Guest
Re: What is considered good art and by whose standards?
You'd best consider what you want as a life long quest. I've been a professional artist for 40 years, and I've never stopped learning, or had any desire to stop.
Theres various ways to evaluate art
If you want to create or assess in an established style, then you generally follow the rules of that style.
Contemporary arts - ie. the past 50 years, are always being evaluated and debated. Many art styles are short lived fashion styles, short lived being about 10 years. They become popular then get boring quickly and get replaced by the next new fashion.
So it's hard to define, and also hard to compare with early art traditions.
Pre 1900's art also took the place of the camera for 1000's of years. So history works and portraits were very common.
Around late 1800's the time of the impressionists 2 things were happening. Photography was replacing traditional portrait paintings, and new synthetic paint pigments where created.
They were more vivid and bright than anyone had seen before in artists paint, the thick bold colors of Van Gogh etc explored the new color palette, along with a new freedom to paint in a less strict representational way. It was the begining of the modern era.
You can judge art by technical ability or emotional response, or both. It depends on the market. Who you are trying to impress, the private art collector or large public institutions. With public institutions you need to impress large audiences numbers, with private art collectors you only need to impress one, the collector.
If you are creating for self pleasure, it doesn't matter who your market is, or if you have any at all. You're doing the creating for yourself for whatever reason, and if others happen to like it too, then that's a bonus.
Most art is bounded by cultural context. What is considered good in punk art does not go down well with impressionists, even though the impressionists were the punks of their day.
So in a religious context you would evaluate chapel or sacred art in the context of the patrons tradition. Displaying images of prophets and clergy etc or not for instance.
Often great art transcends the context into another realm of experience as the veiwer engages with the work, and it speak to them in a personal context.
It's this trancending quality that is usually cited as an idicator of good art. Does is speak to an audience, even if it was just intended as a bit of decoration for a bare wall.
There are deeper considerations that can be studied too. Such as if the artist is a complete and utter bastard, does that mean their art can never be 'good'. Or does the artist need to be aware of what they are communicating in a work, or is it irrelevant as the viewer will make up their own mind, especially 100 years later.
We are still finding out why we 'like' an artwork. Outside of the obvious influences such as social attitudes and tastes, we are still a bit vague on the mechanisms that make us go, 'Wow, I like that'.
The current thinking is our DNA memory is loaded with appeasing shapes, colors forms etc. These can be ancient things like fruit and berry colors and shapes, or sexual shapes that trigger our pleasure centre's.
These deep responses become edited with our contemporary ideas and thinking and at the end of it we conclude the art we're looking at is great or crap. Sometimes it can be just the color range. It just doesn't do anything for us, a nice pic, well done in a skilled way, but it's just a pic. But to a person standing next to you, it hits all the right buttons and they just adore it.
It's kinda nice it works like that. It means all art has a chance to be great in someone's eyes, someday.
Theres various ways to evaluate art
If you want to create or assess in an established style, then you generally follow the rules of that style.
Contemporary arts - ie. the past 50 years, are always being evaluated and debated. Many art styles are short lived fashion styles, short lived being about 10 years. They become popular then get boring quickly and get replaced by the next new fashion.
So it's hard to define, and also hard to compare with early art traditions.
Pre 1900's art also took the place of the camera for 1000's of years. So history works and portraits were very common.
Around late 1800's the time of the impressionists 2 things were happening. Photography was replacing traditional portrait paintings, and new synthetic paint pigments where created.
They were more vivid and bright than anyone had seen before in artists paint, the thick bold colors of Van Gogh etc explored the new color palette, along with a new freedom to paint in a less strict representational way. It was the begining of the modern era.
You can judge art by technical ability or emotional response, or both. It depends on the market. Who you are trying to impress, the private art collector or large public institutions. With public institutions you need to impress large audiences numbers, with private art collectors you only need to impress one, the collector.
If you are creating for self pleasure, it doesn't matter who your market is, or if you have any at all. You're doing the creating for yourself for whatever reason, and if others happen to like it too, then that's a bonus.
Most art is bounded by cultural context. What is considered good in punk art does not go down well with impressionists, even though the impressionists were the punks of their day.
So in a religious context you would evaluate chapel or sacred art in the context of the patrons tradition. Displaying images of prophets and clergy etc or not for instance.
Often great art transcends the context into another realm of experience as the veiwer engages with the work, and it speak to them in a personal context.
It's this trancending quality that is usually cited as an idicator of good art. Does is speak to an audience, even if it was just intended as a bit of decoration for a bare wall.
There are deeper considerations that can be studied too. Such as if the artist is a complete and utter bastard, does that mean their art can never be 'good'. Or does the artist need to be aware of what they are communicating in a work, or is it irrelevant as the viewer will make up their own mind, especially 100 years later.
We are still finding out why we 'like' an artwork. Outside of the obvious influences such as social attitudes and tastes, we are still a bit vague on the mechanisms that make us go, 'Wow, I like that'.
The current thinking is our DNA memory is loaded with appeasing shapes, colors forms etc. These can be ancient things like fruit and berry colors and shapes, or sexual shapes that trigger our pleasure centre's.
These deep responses become edited with our contemporary ideas and thinking and at the end of it we conclude the art we're looking at is great or crap. Sometimes it can be just the color range. It just doesn't do anything for us, a nice pic, well done in a skilled way, but it's just a pic. But to a person standing next to you, it hits all the right buttons and they just adore it.
It's kinda nice it works like that. It means all art has a chance to be great in someone's eyes, someday.
Garry- Admin
- Posts : 1881
Points : 23068
Reputation : 751
Join date : 2008-03-18
Location : Melbourne. Oz
Battle Character
Name: Cyclone Garry
Ability:
(8/10)
Moves / Skills:
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Sat 15 Aug 2020, 19:47 by SX001 (SolareX)
» Stuck in Time
Wed 10 Feb 2016, 11:43 by bLuE
» GLOBAL SHUFFLE
Fri 10 Jul 2015, 18:48 by Garry
» Birthday Shuffle
Thu 25 Jun 2015, 16:26 by Garry
» Parachute - ShiroX
Thu 25 Jun 2015, 08:20 by bLuE
» WOLFDRAGON MOONSHINE
Thu 12 Feb 2015, 12:30 by Garry
» EHA // Evolutionary Hardstyle Addicts [Join now!]
Thu 12 Feb 2015, 02:10 by Noir Souris
» Oure Shuffle
Tue 27 Jan 2015, 00:53 by littlephan
» Denmark Shuffle
Wed 10 Dec 2014, 06:34 by littlephan
» great shuffling songs!!
Fri 07 Nov 2014, 12:11 by Garry
» looking for a little help from any michigan shufflers
Wed 29 Oct 2014, 09:38 by LacedInExcess
» PHD hoodie
Mon 20 Oct 2014, 08:44 by Garry
» Most recent videos
Tue 30 Sep 2014, 11:19 by Garry
» CybaFaeries
Tue 26 Aug 2014, 10:56 by Garry
» HASC - Niall & LittlePhan
Sun 27 Jul 2014, 04:57 by littlephan
» Wanna join our crew?
Tue 01 Jul 2014, 22:35 by littlephan
» Hardstyle<3
Sun 08 Jun 2014, 08:44 by Garry
» Want to join my crew ? :D
Sat 07 Jun 2014, 20:21 by littlephan
» !!Meetup Video!!
Wed 28 May 2014, 22:16 by littlephan
» Raindropz
Wed 28 May 2014, 09:56 by bLuE
» The norwegian shuffle scene
Wed 28 May 2014, 00:17 by littlephan
» Friendly Greetz
Sun 25 May 2014, 04:17 by Garry
» London
Tue 15 Apr 2014, 17:37 by Thefyllesmurfen
» BurgerOff - Tecoma Australia
Mon 14 Apr 2014, 03:46 by Garry
» LED's in phats
Sat 12 Apr 2014, 07:26 by Garry
» Wheres the shuffle in miami?
Wed 09 Apr 2014, 13:57 by Garry
» Sound of Q Dance
Mon 24 Mar 2014, 14:35 by bLuE
» Freezing Cold
Wed 05 Mar 2014, 09:47 by bLuE
» LMFAO - Party Rock Anthem
Thu 27 Feb 2014, 11:29 by Garry
» School Shuffle
Wed 26 Feb 2014, 15:49 by markz
» Why do you like to dance?
Wed 26 Feb 2014, 15:28 by markz
» Trying To make a new crew
Wed 26 Feb 2014, 15:10 by markz
» Dedication
Sat 22 Feb 2014, 19:33 by bLuE
» Introducing Grey!
Thu 06 Feb 2014, 23:19 by AlexGrey
» MERRY CHRISTMAS!!
Wed 25 Dec 2013, 11:03 by Garry
» *** Noir Souris Phats Designs ***
Sat 07 Dec 2013, 10:03 by Noir Souris
» Going Pro
Mon 02 Dec 2013, 14:04 by Garry
» Some Happy feelings?
Sun 17 Nov 2013, 07:15 by SX001 (SolareX)
» Any Shufflers in Phoenix Arizona
Wed 06 Nov 2013, 11:53 by djalphaomega
» shuffle meetups in Florida
Wed 06 Nov 2013, 11:12 by FireAura